The Taco Theory is simple. The functional and aesthetic design of the taco provides for the optimal loss of calories prior to eating. In other words, tacos don't have calories so you are hereby approved to eat as many as you want. Secondly, as the universal representation of Mexican food the taco is the optimal measuring stick to judge the quality of a restaurant.
Fig 1 - The crispy taco |
While I have no so-called "scientific" evidence to back this theory. I seem to recall that I read a study where "they" claimed the lack of calories to be the case. Armed with this fabulous news I am on a mission to conquer the taco. Admittedly I arrive here with a bias based on years of taco goodness. However, moving forward I will do my best to never attempt any degree of impartiality and to utterly and without mercy or prejudice inflict my opinions on those dear few who may actually read this.
My qualifications to identify, eat, review, eat, make, eat and finally eat tacos are many. Growing up in Central Texas with family roots in South Texas Mexican/Tex-Mex food is a way of life. As my go-to genre for comfort and the plethora of options I needed to find a way to compare the quality of restaurants on an apple-to-apple - now taco-to-taco basis.
The ubiquitous Taco can be broken down into several classifications. The first and most pervasive is the crispy taco (fig 1). While common in all manor of tex-mex establishments this is far and away my least favorite. Due to the rigid nature of the shell the options for fillings tend to be limited to ground beef, "taco spice" (which is invariably mostly chili power and cumin), iceberg lettuce, raw tomatoes and bland cheese. Variations do exist but in my nary scientific methodology I surmise they are all the same. Regardless, I will review and comment on these. For the sake of accuracy and equality I will also break my 10+ year avoidance of the annoying "Taco" franchise we have all seen so many commercials for. I do this for you.
Fig 2 - the Taco |
The second major classification - and where I will spend most of my time - is the soft taco. I hate calling it this because this is really just the taco as I will furthermore refer to it. The taco can then be broken into two groups. First is the more traditional street tacos which are made mostly of a meat filling and simple toppings most notably cilantro and onions with possibly some hot sauce. Second is everything else. There is a growing trend for specialty boutique tacos that include anything from traditional meets to a wild mix of ingredients and fusion. I do not mean to imply these are sub par or any less a taco then their traditional counterparts. On the contrary the explosion of specialty tacos and vendors have revived interest in the taco as a dietary staple.
I continue the journey I began so many years ago. But now, with you (dear few) following as I explore the taco. Along the way I will comment (review) other items that are not always tacos but with hopefully some connection. For example, beer is the best accouterments to the taco and therefore should also be reviewed in kind. You get the idea.
The observant tacocionado will notice that I made no mention of breakfast tacos. This is no slant on their quality or position of importance to me. I just consider them an entirely different thing.
The observant tacocionado will notice that I made no mention of breakfast tacos. This is no slant on their quality or position of importance to me. I just consider them an entirely different thing.
No comments:
Post a Comment